Measuring the Life

 Measuring the Life

Hello Everyone! Welcome to another blog post. In this content, I shared my opinions on how biometrics detrimental and beneficial to society. Before I conclude my thesis about biometrics, I must first post its history. 

Biometrics is the science and technology of analyzing human body characteristics. Divided into two basic categories: Biometrics and Physical Technology. Biometrics technology collects data from physical or behavioral attributes related to the human body. Examples of physical biometrics today include facial recognition, iris recognition, and fingerprint recognition, while examples of behavioral biometrics include walking patterns, gestures, and voice recognition. Behavioral biometrics can be viewed as the body’s handwriting as it moves through the world.

Biometrics dated as far back as 500BC in the Babylonian empire. However, the first record of a biometric identification system was in the 1800s, in Paris, France. Alphonse Bertillon developed a method of specific body measurements for the classification and comparison of criminals. While this system was far from perfect, it got the ball rolling on using unique biological characteristics to authenticate identity.

Alphonse Bertillon

 

Technology is built to improve the quality of our life. It brings betterments in the way of our life in every aspect. Biometric technology is also a great invention that brings significant changes to our lifestyle. As said, with great power comes even greater responsibility, biometric technology is a good example of this quote. With all the goosebumps surrounding the positive news about biometrics, it also has a dark side of its own. We know very little about the disadvantages of biometrics, compared to its well-known advantages.

Visitors use Magic Bands to access Disney attractions without waiting in long lines.

Conclusion:

Biometrics in Input and Output Devices

I conclude that biometrics is a risky technology. It means biometric is beneficial and detrimental to one's privacy and society. We all know that biometrics measures a person's physical characteristics to verify their identity. These can include physiological traits, such as fingerprints and eyes, or behavioral characteristics: such as the unique way you'd complete a security-authentication puzzle. To be precise, biometric data must be unique, permanent, and collectible. Once measured, the information is compared and matched in a database.

Every time we unlock our high-tech phones, we necessarily use fingerprint and facial recognition. In iPhones, we ask Siri for a weather update or log in to your online bank account using your fingerprint, you're using biometrics. We might use the technology every day to authenticate our identity or communicate with a personal device, but there are plenty of other uses for biometrics. In my point, biometrics is somewhat a no-hassle technology. However, biometrics might be detrimental.

For example, police can collect DNA and fingerprints at crime scenes or use video surveillance to analyze a suspect's gait or voice. In medicine, wellness exams might include retinal scans or genetic tests. Moreover, when you use a credit card at a cash register, you'll probably supply a signature, which can be analyzed if the issuer suspects forgery. This kind of situation is further lethargic. 

Biometrics are horribly inaccurate, yep I said it, biometrics is not essential that what you have used right now. Biometric is a risky technology, and one of the main risks is one's privacy or security. The risks of using biometrics fall into a few categories, including data and network hacking, rapidly evolving fraud capabilities, biometric enrollment security, familiar fraud, spoofed sensors, and sensor inaccuracy.

For reasons I do not see, but not totally, a significant part of the world is by all accounts in affection with biometrics—clients of costly cell phones and workstations, however even prepared security experts responsible for managing the world's future verification arrangements.  I was shocked to hear the number of participants felt that biometrics were the most important thing in secure confirmation when that so is not the situation.

References:

Adelmeyer, J. (2018, February 6). The future of biometrics technology: Convenience or privacy? Answers On. https://blogs.thomsonreuters.com/answerson/biometrics-technology-convenience-data-privacy/

Douglas, A. (2020, March 4). A Brief History of Biometrics. BioConnect. https://bioconnect.com/a-brief-history-of-biometrics/

Fauscette, M. (2018, April 17). Biometrics Are Coming & So Are Security Concerns. Dark Reading. https://www.darkreading.com/endpoint/biometrics-are-coming-and-so-are-security-concerns/a/d-id/1331536

Grimes, R. A. (2019, January 4). 6 reasons biometrics are bad authenticators (and 1 acceptable use). CSO Online. https://www.csoonline.com/article/3330695/6-reasons-biometrics-are-bad-authenticators-and-1-acceptable-use.html

Johansen, A. G. (n.d.-b). Biometrics and biometric data: What is it and is it secure? Norton. Retrieved February 8, 2019, from https://us.norton.com/internetsecurity-iot-biometrics-how-do-they-work-are-they-safe.html

 M. (2018, December 12). 10 Advantages and Disadvantages of Biometrics System You Should Know. Biometric Today. https://biometrictoday.com/10-advantages-disadvantages-biometrics-technology/